Prediction of Frew Mcmillan vs Balazs Taroczy Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
F. Mcmillan vs B. Taroczy

Frew Mcmillan

RSA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Balazs Taroczy

HUN

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mcmillan 1 - 1 Taroczy

They have played 5 sets in total, with Frew Mcmillan winning 3 and Balazs Taroczy winning 2. The last match between Balazs Taroczy and Frew Mcmillan was at the Vienna, 20-10-1980, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Balazs Taroczy getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcmillan	1
Taroczy	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Vienna(10-20-80)

Stats

Balazs Taroczy

Frew Mcmillan

(SF) Nuremberg(03-08-76)

Stats

Frew Mcmillan

Balazs Taroczy

F. Mcmillan vs B. Taroczy H2H Profile

F. Mcmillan	Stats	B. Taroczy
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.14% (196-248)	Career Total W/L	64.32% (447-248)
0	Hard	1
1	Indoor	0
2	Titles	13
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

F. Mcmillan vs B. Taroczy Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Balazs Taroczy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frew Mcmillan, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Balazs Taroczy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Frew Mcmillan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Balazs Taroczy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Balazs Taroczy winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Frew Mcmillan has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 7/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 48/69). Balazs Taroczy has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 20/7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 39/36).
Player level: In the last year, Frew Mcmillan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Balazs Taroczy has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Frew Mcmillan winning 1 times and Balazs Taroczy being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Frew Mcmillan winning 3 and Balazs Taroczy winning 2.
The last match between Frew Mcmillan and Balazs Taroczy was at the Vienna, 20-10-1980, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Balazs Taroczy getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frew Mcmillan has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Balazs Taroczy has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frew Mcmillan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Balazs Taroczy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Frew Mcmillan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Balazs Taroczy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Frew Mcmillan vs Balazs Taroczy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

F. Mcmillan vs B. Taroczy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

F. Mcmillan	Stats	B. Taroczy
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	2
22	Games Won	20
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

F. Mcmillan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Neu Ulm CH - 25-07-1983
R2 Christoph ZipfC. Zipf	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 04-04-1983
R2 Denys MaasdorpD. Maasdorp	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
Neu Ulm CH - 26-07-1982
R3 Guillermo AuboneG. Aubone	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 04-04-1982
R2 David SmithD. Smith	L	7-5 3-6 6-2	Stats
Gstaad - 06-07-1981
R3 Ivan DupasquierI. Dupasquier	L	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

B. Taroczy Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Marino CH - 15-08-1988
R3 Josef CihakJ. Cihak	W	6-2 6-7 6-4	Stats
R4 Claudio MezzadriC. Mezzadri	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Kitzbuhel - 04-08-1986
R2 Claudio PistolesiC. Pistolesi	W	6-2 6-7 7-6	Stats
R3 Lawson DuncanL. Duncan	W	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
R4 Tomas SmidT. Smid	L	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

F. Mcmillan vs B. Taroczy Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

F. Mcmillan	Stats	B. Taroczy
44.14% (196/248)	YTD Win/Loss	64.08% (437/245)
45.90% (532/627)	Sets Win/Loss	61.13% (1057/672)
48.02% (5322/5760)	Games Win/Loss	54.40% (8893/7453)
43.57% (61/79)	Hard Win/Loss	52.00% (39/36)
41.03% (48/69)	Clay Win/Loss	69.31% (323/143)
41.75% (43/60)	Indoor Hard W/L	47.13% (41/46)
52.11% (37/34)	Grass Win/Loss	51.85% (14/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
484.57	Average Opponent Rank	562.34
45.65% (21/25)	Slam W/L	58.21% (39/28)
40.00% (6/9)	Masters W/L	54.55% (12/10)
100.00% (2/0)	Cups W/L	80.00% (48/12)
44.30% (167/210)	Main Tour W/L	63.34% (330/191)
0.00% (0/4)	Challenger W/L	66.67% (8/4)
42% (148/352)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	64% (348/546)
49% (43/87)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	67% (86/129)
60% (9/15)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (2/4)
45% (70/155)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (114/191)
75% (203/153)	1st Set Won, Won Match	89% (424/377)
25% (203/50)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (424/47)
16% (236/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (255/59)